Light-heavyweight (186-205lbs)
Record: 0-1-1
Height: 6'2"
Q - What made you want to train MMA?
In the words of a better man then I:
“The evil of militarism is not that it shows certain men to be fierce and haughty and excessively warlike. The evil of militarism is that it shows most men to be tame and timid and excessively peaceable. The professional soldier gains more and more power as the general courage of a community declines. Thus the Pretorian guard became more and more important in Rome as Rome became more and more luxurious and feeble. The military man gains the civil power in proportion as the civilian loses the military virtues. And as it was in ancient Rome so it is in contemporary Europe. There never was a time when nations were more militarist. There never was a time when men were less brave. All ages and all epics have sung of arms and the man; but we have effected simultaneously the deterioration of the man and the fantastic perfection of the arms. Militarism demonstrated the decadence of Rome, and it demonstrates the decadence of Prussia.”
- G.K Chesterton
Q - What do you think makes you stand out as a fighter?
My overall cadence, creativity and depth of experience, not only as a fighter and martial artist, but as a person. As a fighter and an athlete, I can be beaten. As a person who sees past all of that, past the egos, past the agendas, I can never be beaten. I am just here to have fun and try to kick you upside your head.
Q - Who or what do you get your inspiration from?
Anyone not willing to swallow the subversive mediocrity that pervades the undercurrents of globalization, and the seemingly universal inclination to blind submission and obedience; those unwilling to surcumb to coercion by the powers and systems that play to the herd’s sheepish grin as it marches to the drone of consumerism, exploitation and nihilistic non-existentialism (or equally hand-me-down fundamentalism). If you are one of these few people, you inspire me to try and do the same.
Q - If you could fight someone famous, who would it be?
Richard Dawkins. I would love to watch squirm under the weight his own, all encompassing, but exceedingly shallow doctrine. Not out of malice, but sheer amusement.